Analysis of Al Thibaq and Al Jinas In The Book of Repentance From Shahih Muslim And Their Use In Teaching Rhetoric To Third Year Students at Muslim Cendekia Institute تحليل الطباق والجناس في كتاب التوبة من صحيح مسلم وتوظيفهما في تعليم البلاغة لدى طلاب المستوى الثالث بجامعة الراية

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Rizal Khoirul Insan
Abd Rohim
Fajar Sidik
Harlina

Abstract


Prophetic rhetoric represents the highest form of human eloquence, before which thoughts and intellects have humbled, as it is a divine revelation encompassing concise yet comprehensive expressions (jawāmiʿ al-kalim). Arabs, both in the past and present, have drawn the richness of their language from the speech of the best of creation. This research aims to examine the rhetorical styles found in the noble Prophetic traditions, with particular focus on the devices of antithesis (ṭibāq) and paronomasia (jinās) in the Hadiths of the Book of Repentance from Sahih Muslim. The researcher adopted a descriptive-analytical method by identifying instances of ṭibāq and jinās within the Hadiths of the Book of Repentance, then analyzing them rhetorically and clarifying their semantic and educational functions. The study concluded that the rhetorical device of ṭibāq appeared in twenty-nine instances, varying between affirmative antithesis and negative antithesis. This device contributed to highlighting semantic dualities such as repentance and sin, hope and despair, and guidance and misguidance. Furthermore, the device of jinās was found in nineteen instances, distributed between complete and incomplete paronomasia, and it demonstrated a clear effect in beautifying the style and strengthening the meaning without violating the contextual appropriateness of expression. The study ultimately concludes that the abundance of these rhetorical devices in the Prophetic Hadith is evidence of the richness and depth of its eloquence. Moreover, employing these devices in teaching Arabic to non-native speakers contributes to the development of their linguistic skills—particularly speaking and expressive abilities—and brings them closer to the beauty and authenticity of the Arabic language. Write abstract in good English with only one paragraph.


##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section

Arabic Language Education

References

Abū Bakr, Idrīs Aghrangh. 2025. “Aḍwā’ ‘alā Muḥassināt al-Badī‘ fī al-Balāghah al-‘Arabiyyah.” 05 (02). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15106673.

Aḥmad Ṭu‘aymah, Rusydī. 1986. al-Marji‘ fī Ta‘līm al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah li-al-Nāṭiqīn bi-Lughāt Ukhrā. Riyadh: Jāmi‘ah al-Malik Sa‘ūd.

Al-‘Assāf, Ṣāliḥ ibn Ḥamd. 2006. al-Madkhal ilā al-Baḥṡ fī al-‘Ulūm al-Sulūkiyyah. Riyadh: al-‘Ubaykān. https://archive.org/details/01486-pdf

Al-Ḥumaydāwī, Khālid Kāẓim Ḥumaydī. 2011. “Asālīb al-Badī‘ fī Nahj al-Balāghah.” Jāmi‘at al-Kūfah.

Al-Nūristānī, Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. 2023. al-Madkhal ilā Ṣaḥīḥ al-Imām Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj. Idārah al-Syu’ūn al-Fanniyyah.

Al-Qazwīnī, Jalāl al-Dīn. 2003. al-Īḍāḥ fī ‘Ulūm al-Balāghah: al-Ma‘ānī wa al-Bayān wa al-Badī‘. Disunting oleh Ibrāhīm Syams al-Dīn. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Qūṣī, Muḥammad ‘Abd al-Syāfī. 2016. ‘Abqariyyah al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah. ISESCO: Mansyūrāt al-Munazzamah al-Islāmiyyah.

Al-Sakkākī, Yūsuf ibn Abī Bakr ibn Muḥammad ibn ‘Alī. 1987. Miftāḥ al-‘Ulūm. Disunting oleh Na‘īm Zarzūr. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. 1987. al-Muzhir fī ‘Ulūm al-Lughah wa Anwā‘ihā. Beirut, Lebanon: Mansyūrāt al-Maktabah al-‘Aṣriyyah.

Billāh, A. Hirdī Rāḍī. 2023. “Tarākīb al-Jumlah al-Ismiyyah fī Sūrah al-Kahf wa al-Istifādah Minhā fī Ta‘līm al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah li-al-Nāṭiqīn bi-Ghayrihā.” Jāmi‘ah al-Rāyah.

Duwaydārī, Rajā’ Waḥīd. 2000. al-Baḥṡ al-‘Ilmī: Asāsiyyātuhu al-Naẓariyyah wa Mumārasatuhu al-‘Amaliyyah. Dār al-Fikr al-Mu‘āṣir.

Ibn Manẓūr. 1994. Lisān al-‘Arab. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir.

Lisān, Fawzī Ṣidqī. 2023. “al-Ṭibāq fī al-Ḥadīṡ al-Nabawī al-Wārid fī Kitāb Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī fī Kitāb al-Da‘awāt wa al-Istifādah Minhu fī Ta‘līm al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah li-Ghayr al-Nāṭiqīn Bihā (al-Mustawā al-Mutaqaddim).” Jāmi‘ah al-Rāyah. https://www.notion.so/repositortyimc/253a3dd4f94b80819cf8fbf072585745?v=253a3dd4f94b81309662000cd084d062&p=253a3dd4f94b810b8d16f8b4ebea75ee&pm=s

Muhammad, Zola, dan Fajar Sidik. 2025. “The Evaluation of the Speaking Skill Teaching Method at the Quranic School of Dewan Da‘wah in Jakarta in Light of the Criteria of Abdulrahman Ibrahim al-Fawzan.” 7 (1): 1971–1985 https://proceedingincisst.arraayah.ac.id/index.php/incisst/article/view/31

Qāsim, Muḥammad Aḥmad, dan Muḥy al-Dīn Dīb. 2003. ‘Ulūm al-Balāghah (al-Badī‘ wa al-Bayān wa al-Ma‘ānī). Tripoli: al-Mu’assasah al-Ḥadīṡah li al-Kitāb.

Qīrah, Ṣabāḥ. t.t. “al-Ḥadīṡ al-Nabawī al-Syarīf wa Āliyyāt Taḥlīl al-Khiṭāb: al-Bayān al-Nabawī al-Syarīf wa Dawruhu fī Ta’sīs al-Dars al-Balāghī.” al-Jumhūriyyah al-Jazā’iriyyah al-Dīmuqrāṭiyyah al-Sya‘biyyah Wizārah al-Ta‘līm al-‘Ālī wa al-Baḥṡ al-‘Ilmī.

Taufiqurrahman, M., Abd Rohim, dan Muḥammad Furqon al-Murnī. 2025. “Tarqiyah Mahārah al-Kalām Ladā al-Nāṭiqīn bi-Ghayr al-‘Arabiyyah min Mufradāt Gharīb al-Ḥadīṡ al-Mustafādah min Kitāb al-Arba‘īn al-Nawawiyyah.” 7 (1): 1697–1714 https://proceedingincisst.arraayah.ac.id/index.php/incisst/article/view/3

Yusuf, Muri. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: PT Fajar Interpratama Mandiri.